Domain Atlas / Public benefits & eligibility
Indiana / IBM eligibility modernization
Indiana's privatized eligibility modernization produced over a million denials in its early years — many procedural rather than substantive — before the state canceled the contract and litigated with its vendor.[3]
What happened
Indiana's welfare-eligibility modernization outsourced application processing to an IBM-led consortium, replacing caseworker relationships with call centers, document imaging, and automated timeliness rules. Documented accounts describe over a million denials in the program's first years — many for procedural "failure to cooperate" rather than substantive ineligibility — followed by the state canceling the contract and years of litigation between Indiana and IBM.
The sociotechnical reading
The automation here was less a model than a rigid procedural pipeline — but the sociotechnical lesson generalizes: when the system's default action on ambiguity is denial, and the human capacity that used to absorb ambiguity has been removed, ordinary documentation friction becomes mass adverse action. The pressure map matters too: modernization was driven by cost-reduction targets, and the "error" the system optimized against was overpayment, not wrongful denial. Asymmetric error costs, encoded in procedure, are a governance choice — usually an unexamined one.
The concepts used in this reading are defined in the Field Guide; the governance responses live in the Practice Library.